Authors can submit their research articles to  
Untitled Document


IJSEA is index with









IJSEA Archive (Volume 7, Issue 2)

International Journal of Science and Engineering Applications (IJSEA)  (Volume 7, Issue 2 February 2018)

Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Coupled Wall RC Structures

Ramin Taghinezhad, Arash Taghinezhad, Vahid Mahdavifar (PI), Vafa Soltangharaei


Keywords: concrete, nonlinear static analysis, reinforced concrete buildings, seismic vulnerability, structural shear wall

Abstract References BibText

        Swiss Federal Institute of Technology developed a simple method to evaluate seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete buildings with structural walls using an engineering approach. The objective of this research was the evaluation of the developed method through the capacity curve with a focus on the buildings with frame action due to the coupling of the walls by piers and spandrels. For this purpose, a numerical model of a six-story reinforced concrete structure with sixteen structural walls was created in two directions and nonlinear static analysis was performed to obtain the capacity curve under different lateral load patterns. It was found that there is an appropriate overlap between the numerical model and developed method in terms of capacity curve and vulnerability.

[1]Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 2002, Seismic vulnerability of existing building, Zurich.
[2] Oskouei, V.A. and Mahdavifar, V., 2013. Modeling of Two-Cell Concrete Cores for Investigation of Reliabality of Equivalent Column Method.
[3] Mahdavifar, V., 2017. Cyclic performance of connections used in hybrid cross-laminated timber (Ph.D. dissertation), Oregon State University, Oregon, USA.
[4] Mahdavifar, V., Barbosa, A., Sinha, A., Muszynski, L. and Gupta, R., 2017. Hysteretic behaviour of metal connectors for hybrid (high-and low-grade mixed species) cross laminated timber, WCTE 2016 World Conference on Timber Engineering, Vienna, Austria.
[5] Belejo, A. and Bento, R., 2016. Improved modal pushover analysis in seismic assessment of asymmetric plan buildings under the influence of one and two horizontal components of ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 87, pp.1-15.
[6] Soltangharaei, V., Razi, M. and Gerami, M., 2016. Comparative Evaluation of Behavior Factor of SMRF Structures for Near and Far Fault Ground Motions. Periodica Polytechnica. Civil Engineering, 60(1), p.75.
[7] Soleimani, S., Aziminejad, A. and Moghadam, A.S., 2018. Approximate two-component incremental dynamic analysis using a bidirectional energy-based pushover procedure. Engineering Structures, 157, pp.86-95.
[8] Fanaie, N. and Ezzatshoar, S., 2014. Studying the seismic behavior of gate braced frames by incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 99, pp.111-120.
[9] Soltangharaei, V., Razi, M. and Gerami, M., 2015. Behaviour factor of buckling restrained braced structures for near and far fault ground motions. International Journal of Structural Engineering, 6(2), pp.158-171.
[10] Chomchuen, P. and Boonyapinyo, V., 2017. Incremental dynamic analysis with multi-modes for seismic performance evaluation of RC bridges. Engineering Structures, 132, pp.29-43.
[11] Mahdi, T. and Gharaie, V.S., 2011. Plan irregular RC frames: comparison of pushover with nonlinear dynamic analysis. Asian J Civil Eng Build Housing, 12(6), pp.679-690.
[12] Yahmi, D., Branci, T., Bouchaïr, A. and Fournely, E., 2017. Evaluation of behaviour factors of steel moment-resisting frames using standard pushover method. Procedia Engineering, 199, pp.397-403.
[13] Pan, X., Zheng, Z. and Wang, Z., 2017. Estimation of floor response spectra using modified modal pushover analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 92, pp.472-487.
[14] Soltangharaei, V., Zarean, M., Mahdavifar, V., Taghinezhad, R. and Taghinezhad, A., 2017. Response Modification Factor for Cold-Formed Steel Structures Using Pushover Analysis. International Journal of Engineering Science, pp. 15875-15880.
[15] Li, S., Zuo, Z., Zhai, C. and Xie, L., 2017. Comparison of static pushover and dynamic analyses using RC building shaking table experiment. Engineering Structures, 136, pp.430-440.
[16] Taghinezhad, R., Taghinezhad, A., Mahdavifar, V. and Soltangharaei, V., Numerical Investigation of Deflection Amplification Factor in Moment Resisting Frames Using Nonlinear Pushover Analysis. International Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Science, pp. 1-7.
[17] Bocciarelli, M. and Barbieri, G., 2017. A numerical procedure for the pushover analysis of masonry towers. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 93, pp.162-171.
[18] Taghinezhadbilondy, Ramin. "Extending Use of Simple for Dead Load and Continuous for Live Load (SDCL) Steel Bridge System to Seismic Areas." (2016), Ph.D. dissertation.
[19] Azizinamini, Atorod, Aaron Yakel, Ardalan Sherafati, Ramin Taghinezhad, and Jawad H. Gull. "Flexible Pile Head in Jointless Bridges: Design Provisions for H-Piles in Cohesive Soils." Journal of Bridge Engineering 21, no. 3 (2016).
[20] Pham, Huy, Ramin Taghinezhad, and Atorod Azizinamini. Experimental Investigation of Redundancy of Twin Steel Box-Girder Bridges Under Concentrated Load. No. 17-03649. 2017.
[21] Mohammadi, Alireza, Jawad H. Gull, Ramin Taghinezhad, and Atorod Azizinamini. "Assessment and Evaluation of Timber Piles Used in Nebraska for Retrofit and Rating." (2014).
[22] Computers and Structures Inc. (CSI), SAP2000 Three Dimensional Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures V8.4.5, Berkeley, California.
[23] Naeim, Farzad, ed. The Seismic Design Handbook. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.

title = " Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Coupled Wall RC Structures ",
journal = "International Journal of Science and Engineering Applications (IJSEA)",
volume = "7",
number = "2",
pages = "001 - 007 ",
year = "2018",
author = " Ramin Taghinezhad, Arash Taghinezhad, Vahid Mahdavifar (PI), Vafa Soltangharaei ",